Skip to Main Content.

Solutions

Biography

For nearly 30 years, Mr. Imbriglia defended products liability and toxic tort suits in eastern Pennsylvania. A former prosecutor with the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office, Mr. Imbriglia regularly practices in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. He represents pharmaceutical, medical device, and product manufacturers in individual cases and mass tort litigation, including personal injury lawsuits, medical monitoring cases, and proposed class actions. In the toxic tort field, Mr. Imbriglia has worked on cases involving exposures to lead, beryllium, PCB’s, benzene, and asbestos. Most recently, Mr. Imbriglia has represented a publishing company accused of conspiring with a pharmaceutical company to conceal the side effects of a prescription drug; summary judgment for our client was entered in the first four cases decided. In another recent litigation, Mr. Imbriglia guided an engineering firm to complete victory in a mass tort in Philadelphia. More than 50 plaintiffs sued the engineering firm, alleging that, because of its negligence, they had contracted chronic beryllium disease or needed to be medically monitored for that condition. The engineering firm had conducted testing revealing high levels of beryllium emissions at a plant in the 1970s and 1980s. Arguing that the engineering firm had a duty to prevent this exposure in various ways, plaintiffs brought personal injury lawsuits and a medical monitoring class action against the firm. After years of discovery and litigation, Mr. Imbriglia won dismissals of the personal injury claims and the class action.

 

See Reeser v. Spotts, Stevens & McCoy, Inc., 2011 PA Super 17 and Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp., 609 F.3d 239 (3d Cir. 2010).

 

In recent years, Mr. Imbriglia has also represented the manufacturer of an insulation product in a nationwide class action where building owners allege that the product “off-gassed,” thereby exposing them to hazardous chemicals; the manufacturer of a component of an insulin-delivery system that was alleged to over- and under-deliver insulin with life-threatening consequences; and the manufacturer of ceiling tiles that allegedly released PCBs and caused cancer in building occupants.

Other Info About Stephen

Experience

Legal Work Highlights

In 2012 and 2013, Mr. Imbriglia has represented a publishing company and its former subsidiary, a medical communications company, in more than 200 cases where plaintiffs allege that they were harmed by a drug whose side effects were concealed or deliberately distorted by the clients as part of a conspiracy with the drug’s manufacturer. In the first four cases to be decided, motions for summary judgment were granted in our clients’ favor. Those decisions were appealed, though the appeals were ultimately dismissed by the plaintiffs. In the meantime, more than forty cases have been dismissed as the plaintiffs search for a way to overcome the court’s rulings.

 

In addition, Mr. Imbriglia has represented various clients in the following focus areas:

 

Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Cases

 

    • Defense of a pharmaceutical company in a multimillion-dollar death claim involving the mistaken administration of a drug to an individual in anaphylaxis and the allegation that drug was inadequately labeled.

 

    • Defense of the manufacturer of PPA-containing products in cases brought by individuals who suffered strokes.

 

    • Defense of the manufacturer of a component of an insulin delivery device in numerous cases involving the allegation that component was defectively designed, resulting in overdoses and “underdoses” of insulin to plaintiffs.

 

    • Defense of a publishing company and its subsidiary in a series of personal injury cases where plaintiffs allege conspiracy to conceal the side effects of the prescription drug Risperdal.

 

  • Defense of a publishing company and its subsidiary in a series of personal injury cases where plaintiffs allege that the patient education monograph for the prescription drug Reglan was inadequate.

 

Toxic Tort Cases

 

    • Defense of the manufacturer of spray polyurethane foam insulation in a class action alleging that the product “off-gassed,” exposing building occupants to hazardous chemicals.

 

    • Defense of a company operating a lead-processing plant in a claim by a worker at an adjacent facility that he developed porphyria as a result of exposure to lead.

 

    • Defense of the manufacturer of products for the dental industry in mesothelioma cases involving short-term asbestos exposure.

 

    • Defense of an engineering company in a mass tort involving exposures to beryllium and claims for medical monitoring.

 

    • Defense of a product manufacturer in personal and property damage claims arising from a leaking underground gasoline tank, resulting in exposures to gasoline and benzene.

 

    • Defense of the manufacturer of mineral spirits in a wrongful death claim by the estate of a painter who allegedly died due to benzene exposure.

 

  • Defense of a grinding wheel manufacturer in a case brought by the purchaser of property for pre-existing lead contamination of ground and water.

 

Class Actions

 

    • Defense of the manufacturer of spray-applied insulation in a nationwide class for personal injury and property damage.

 

    • Defense of the manufacturer of an OTC dermatologic skin cream in a proposed national class for economic loss.

 

    • Defense of a smokeless tobacco company in several nationwide classes for medical monitoring and reimbursement of medical expenses.

 

    • Defense of an engineering company in a proposed regional class for medical monitoring secondary to beryllium exposure.

 

  • Defense of a fireproofing manufacturer in various asbestos-related class actions.

 

Additional Representative Cases

 

    • Defense of manufacturer of spray-applied insulation in nationwide class action involving allegations of exposure to isocyanates and VOCs.

 

    • Defense of fireproofing manufacturer in numerous asbestos property damages cases brought by building owners seeking tens of millions of dollars for asbestos removal costs.

 

    • Defense of engineering firm in multiple personal injury and medical monitoring suits arising from beryllium exposure.

 

    • Defense of geotechnical engineer in wrongful death suit resulting from pier collapse.

 

    • Defense of structural engineer in property damage suit arising from building collapse.

 

  • Defense of manufacturers in class actions involving asbestos, dietary supplements, tobacco product, beryllium and OTC dermatologic skin cream.

Education

Boston College Law School|Wesleyan University


J.D., cum laude|B.A., cum laude


|


|

Clerkships

Stephen served as a clerk for the court(s) and judge(s) below:

Law Clerk, Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1980-1981

Courts

Stephen is admitted to practice before the following court(s):

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania|Commonwealth of Massachusetts|United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania|United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania|United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit|United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit


|||||

Recognition

Local & National Recognition

Listed in Best Lawyers®, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants

 

Selected to the Pennsylvania Super Lawyers list, Class Action/Mass Torts

 

AV® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell

 

Recipient of the Chapter Award from the Boston College Law School Alumni Association, 2013

Professional Affiliations

Professional Affiliations & Memberships

Philadelphia Bar Association
Federal Courts Committee

Philadelphia Chapter of Boston College Law School Alumni Association
President